Which is the weakest strategy?

I don't tease/troll, I am irritated by people who 'just leave opinions' without knowing what they are talking about, you're one of them.

Tarafından yazıldı Aristosseur, 19.07.2011 at 15:15

I don't tease/troll, I am irritated by people who 'just leave opinions' without knowing what they are talking about, you're one of them.

You must be channer, think that is superior people. Dude, if the people really like PD, i can change my arguments:

PD is overrated.

Better now?

Yeah, ffs, why're you unneccessarily aggressive Aristo?

I hate people like you, they make me sick.

Much hate, less help each other to have a great competition. It shouldn't be like that. The real bad thing in games online is people calling other "noobs" instead of help with some tips.

But have nice people here yet.

Keep on posting shit uninformed opinions.
Don't forget to +rep Ironail.

Tarafından yazıldı Aristosseur, 19.07.2011 at 17:29

Don't forget to +rep Ironail.

Good lad.

Master of Stealth. Seriously, It's really shitty I won' play this game again until you buff MoS.

PD is for poopoo heads.

PD should be disbanded

Nalav SRTONG

Also. DONT CHANGE BLITZKRIEG!!! (unless you make it stronger and faster)

Sky Menace, because I haven't bought it yet.

"There are no weak strategies, only weak Afterwind players." -Me

Tarafından yazıldı Acquiesce, 29.07.2011 at 17:14

"There are no weak strategies, only weak Afterwind players." -Me

Then you've clearly never tried Lucky Bastard.

Tarafından yazıldı BASED Ironail, 29.07.2011 at 17:25

Tarafından yazıldı Acquiesce, 29.07.2011 at 17:14

"There are no weak strategies, only weak Afterwind players." -Me

Then you've clearly never tried Lucky Bastard.

Looks like the Lucky Bastard became Unlucky.

I only have 12k total sp so i havn't used all the strats.

i have mainly went from tank general<master of stealth<G warfare< naval commander


the reason naval commander is last is because i TOTALLY underestimated it and threw it out of the equation. But i was so wrong, it is pretty lethal IF YOU PICK THE RIGHT STARTING COUNTRIES.

Also, its fun to play as it requires different play strats.


THIS is why naval commander is so powerfull. (people underestimate it)

plus the battleships can take on any enemy..

and i havn't even got started on the best part of naval commander, SUBS






with what i mentioned and having a starting capital next to the sea (boats are able to go into the city) you will be a very very hard target to take out.


what i do is i make tons of subs and put them all around my base (in stacks of 1-3)
and i have at least 10 destroyers (subs can't cap the base, destroyers can.) (also put in stacks of 1-3)

i have NO defense on my base, so i allow the attacker to take my base instantly. Thus allowing my next turn to use my powerful attack on my ships to obliterate their forces at my base.




downside? once the heart of the battle moves inland your disadvantage starts. Your main force on land is massive spam from naval transports/ air transports, While hopefully distracting your foe enough with your ships so you can take some major cities.


-one last thing, once you need to move inland, going for the highest reinforcement cities is a MUST



as for being the best strategy.. hell no.

most cities and most of your enemies will be inland away from you ships.


-still a very fun strat. and a must play strat.

Out of all the strategys they choose NC?

Lol

NC is pretty awesome with good economy

Tarafından yazıldı DURRHUNTER, 16.03.2012 at 18:21

NC is pretty awesome with good economy

If NC is so preety awesome, why noone use it

Tarafından yazıldı BASED Ironail, 29.07.2011 at 17:25

Tarafından yazıldı Acquiesce, 29.07.2011 at 17:14

"There are no weak strategies, only weak Afterwind players." -Me

Then you've clearly never tried Lucky Bastard.

lol, and lucky bastard is by far the weakest

NC ia good, but it's very limited as to how it can be used. I once saw someone do great with it in a euro game, but i still have no idea how that was possible, lol
and Imp is great, if you know how to use it, however, to win with it is very hard without an ally (same for IF, in most cases). still, i don't know why its so far up the list

Why does everyone say NC is crap, it's good.

All strats are weak compaired to Sky Menace..

Tarafından yazıldı FrancisL.Sampson, 13.04.2012 at 00:42

All strats are weak compaired to Sky Menace..

PD/GW

Tarafından yazıldı Guest, 12.04.2012 at 20:11

Why does everyone say NC is crap, it's good.

You're joking, right? NC is a really bad strategy. Don't even bring up the "YOU HAVE TO USE IT CORRECTLY," because every other strategy, with the exception of blitz and LB, can be used better.

Lucky Bastard is disastrous. Naval Commander is too limited. And Blitz's defense is unbelievably shitty.

Tarafından yazıldı Spart, 14.04.2012 at 21:48

Lucky Bastard is disastrous. Naval Commander is too limited. And Blitz's defense is unbelievably shitty.

Changing blitz def to -1 should be good, or instead making it have fine defense, but everything costs 30 more (this would definitely be a good way to nerf it so it's not OP, as I rely on heavy $$$ just to use it already).

Lucky /b/tard needs to take away the +10 cost, increase view range possibly, and make it so ARB can randomly roll in between 1 and 20, with 4 - 8 having the highest chance of being rolled.

Naval Commander is really good is some places, but most of the time is useless. I've only used it on Oceania, but it could use a boost.


I usually use GW, SM and BZ only, so this is just my two cents.

Tarafından yazıldı Stomach Ulcers, 14.04.2012 at 22:53

Tarafından yazıldı Garde, 14.04.2012 at 22:27

Tarafından yazıldı Spart, 14.04.2012 at 21:48

Lucky Bastard is disastrous. Naval Commander is too limited. And Blitz's defense is unbelievably shitty.

Changing blitz def to -1 should be good, or instead making it have fine defense, but everything costs 30 more (this would definitely be a good way to nerf it so it's not OP, as I rely on heavy $$$ just to use it already).

Blitz is already an expensive strat, adding more cost would make it unusable instead of niche. Blitz is fine how it is.

Then why does everyone (even fruit) agree it sucks? And why did you guys tell me I shouldn't use it in the Blitz thread?

Just use sM.. have the range of blitz, the defense of infantry, the attack of tanks, and not be effected by terrain.. And you can use it anywhere you want

Tarafından yazıldı FrancisL.Sampson, 14.04.2012 at 23:51

Just use sM.. have the range of blitz, the defense of infantry, the attack of tanks, and not be effected by terrain.. And you can use it anywhere you want

You can't take everything between Shanghai and Tehran with SM though : )