Future UN 2022 2.0!

All my custom maps are deleted and i do not exist on atwar anymore. thank the assholes who ruined my atwar experience.

North Korea FTW!!!!

I am going to add a list of players who are banned from using UN.

With a screenshot MACEDONIAN is banned from being UN for going rogue. He broke Rule 7 Under Section 1 and the screenshot is below to prove it.



With a screenshot kingblueprint014 is banned for being UN for going rogue. He broke Rule 11 Under Section 1 and the screenshot is below to prove it. He was taking oil.

Played a game with BAStrike today, he went rogue and killed another UN before SP farming me, claiming that I never sent him an alliance request, which I did, and he declined five times in a row before declaring me rogue.


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/829/4mat.jpg/

So UN gets to be like NSA? Are you kidding me? And it takes the fun away, who deoesn't like overthrowing UN with some loyal buds?

Oh and, remove UN3, add some ''special nation''. Like a mercenary company or a terrorist.

Removing a un will unbalance the UNS. They aren't op as they have a set amount per turn and over exceeding that in troop expenses will cause the UN to go into debt. I did that on purpose to reduce rogue uns. Also I do like the mercenary idea but there is no room for it for now. Also to reply to MelGibson his screenshot is not evident to state that he sent me ally requests. He had 3 turns to send ally request and he only sent to everyone else besides me. Not to mention how many people told me he had 169 subs beside my capital base. He was just mad that he had to ally end and its under Section 9 in the exceptions. MelGibson you did not show screenshots of you sending ally requests during the 3 turn duration you had to do it. You sent me ally requests after the 3 turns were up so that is your own fault and you should read the rules as I told everyone at the beginning of the game.

MelGibson don't forget you were banned for sp farming a un game before by Cpt.Magic. You are known for that and you even wallfucked my embassies and admitted that you did that incase you wanted to go rogue. You eventually did go rogue like you wanted too. The entire player body agreed with me and only MACE agreed with you because I killed him for going rogue as well hence the screenshot above.

Tarafından yazıldı 4Chan, 05.07.2013 at 04:18

Played a game with BAStrike today, he went rogue and killed another UN before SP farming me, claiming that I never sent him an alliance request, which I did, and he declined five times in a row before declaring me rogue.


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/829/4mat.jpg/

BAStrike didn't go rogue. We voted to ally end the game and I PMed you myself asking politely to ally end with us. But no, you were the US, how could that be fair to you ? So you just declined to send an ally request until BAStrike gave you 3 turns warning to ally end with all of us or die. You chose the hard way.

And btw, we came up with the idea of ally ending on 1 turn before starting the 3 turns warning, that makes 4 total turns.. So how could he decline your ally request 5 times...

Alıntı yap:

"Oh, when the saints go M.A.R.C.H.ing in
Oh, when the saints go M.A.R.C.H.ing in
I want to be in that number
When the saints go M.A.R.C.H.ing in"

I've had issues with how WWIV starts on this game. I have edited the rules to specify how WWIV starts. For example, if 4 players are at war and a 5th person declares war then WWIV begins and no reason is needed for the 5th person.

Update #1 in version 2.0!

Hey guys,

I have made big changes to update Future UN to make it better.

The update notes are below:

Increased reinforcements in nations to balance the game.
Fighters can no longer take cities.
Added nuke silos to the game, now you can only build nukes at nuke silos.
Added Oilfields to disputed land except Singapore & Cyprus however Singapore's & Cyprus's income has being increased by 400. (Added this info to Section 4: Disputed Territory)
Added a new units NKSF (North Korean Special Forces).
Added Aircraft Carriers but made seperate ones for Fighters, Bombers, and French Fighters.
Added a Costal Battery Units to setup Defenses against Navy.
Added a Heavy Artillery Unit.
Edited the UN Embassy Rule to reduce rogue UNS.

I will be running Future UN 2022 2.0 again today along with this new update and I will reedit this post to add future updates.

Update #2

Hey guys look at the new updates below!

Removed all Aircraft Carriers due to not being able to fix issue loading planes on carriers.
Added a navy unit called Cruisers
Increased Brazilian Militia's cost per unit to 50.
Increased Stealth Militia cost per unit to 50.
Reduced Swedish Tanks cost to 80
Increased Androids cost per unit to 100.
Increased Air Transport Capacity to transport units to 6.
Reduced Air Transport cost per unit to 400
Increased Long-rang Missile Cost per units to 3000
Increased Short Rang Missile cost per units to 1500
Changed Rule 3 so when oil is captured you must declare war for it.
Reduced Reasons for War due to too many wars.
Adding new rule, vote to rogue a player instead of UN declaring a nation rogue but the votes only count from players under
the same UN's control.

The increase of cost per units for certain units are to balance the game more and Air transports should be able to carry more units hence the transport capacity upgrade. Short and long rang missiles.

More updates to come!

Update #3!

Hey guys more updates for you!

UN3 will no longer exist but UN3 has being replaced by another player however due to another player in game China was split due to civil war during WW3.]

All notes are below for update.

Replaced UN3 with a player, split china into "Hans Republic of China" and "Manchu People of China"
Reduced reinforcement count in USA.
Relocated UN1 and UN2 plus embassies.
Added oilfields for China demo and commie.
Added 2 new disputed territory called Lhasa in China and Hawaii USA.
Changed Rule 20. Read it under section 1.
Changed the Capital of China: Southwest to Guiyang
Add nuke silo to Demo china and fix Commie nuke silo.
Taiwan is no longer neutral but remains disputed but currently owned by The Great Korean Empire.

I hope to update this map some more!

....

I can't read all your text...

Make the 2 UNs stronger, THEN remove UN3. Problem solved.

To remove a un3 means relocating un2. I have a third un incase one leaves, goes rogue, and/or disconnects. A third un is a failsafe idea i came up with to keep the un world in order.

Scar you may wanna fix all the 8 reinforcement cities :/ to many countries are WAY op with them.

Also make all disputed areas neutral so its more obvious that its disputed

I would but the problem is that the disputed territories that are currently controlled are unlikely to be deserted after WW3 due to future un's background. Some cities are set to 8 reinforcements to give nations a fighting chance to survive however I will review it and possibly adjust them in the next update.

Tarafından yazıldı Anon, 13.07.2013 at 16:03

Stop making UN versions. We are tired of it.

This was made awhile ago and updated since then. If you don't like UN games then simply don't play them. Problem solved

P.S. This UN was made quite a few months ago nearly the same time I got premium which was February so this un was inspired by C&C UN and it has being updated since.

Pro tip~
Don't like uns? then don't read any forum about one

Pro tip~
when your version of UN is worse than the original, plz deleted it and start over again.

Tarafından yazıldı Guest, 14.07.2013 at 21:54

Pro tip~
when your version of UN is worse than the original, plz deleted it and start over again.

I have not seen you play future un yet so you should consider trying it before judging it mate.

Again waste of your time to post idiotic comments when you could just not play it. Good job.

Anon,

are you really that dense? If you click on my username it will show you my previous usernames on this account.

I'm BAStrike and this account is my only one.

Also if you think you can do better then lets see you make a un map. btw "yolo" so you might as well since you apparently have something to prove.

Lets see you make a better UN and let see if you got what it takes because all I see here is all talk and no action.

You're suggesting another UN? Jeez, it's addictive as crack stop making more!

Let this be a reminder to any and all who plays this UN!!!

8. The UN cannot use or build nukes at all or it's auto rogue for them! (See Section 8 & 7).

UN1 built a nuke and didn't bother to read the rules when I specifically said to everyone to read the damn rules.

Since he built a nuke I declared him rogue as he is already auto rogue because of the rule.

Almost everyone wanted me to give him a chance when he didn't put effort to reading the rules plus they neglect that its auto rogue for un.

I said no because hes auto rogue and cannot be using or building nukes.

Everyone who supported un1 sided with him and declared me rogue when he broke the rules and now so did everyone else for siding with him, supporting him.

I was going to take out UN1 and then the other rogue nations but then it just happens that I had a damn power outage again. So I didn't get to do what I was suppose to do.

None the less,

ANY AND ALL PEOPLE WHO WANTS TO PLAY FUTURE UN MUST READ RULES OR YOU RISK GOING ROGUE. I DID NOT MAKE THE RULES SO PEOPLE CAN BREAK THEM. THE PLAYERS THAT SUPPORTED A ROGUE UN FOR BREAKING A RULE ARE CLEARLY STUPID. ALSO FUCK THE RULES? YOU GUYS MADE YOURSELVES SOUND MORE DUMB BY SAYING THAT. IF RULES ARE MEANT TO BE BROKEN THEN WHY DO WE OBEY THE LAW? ITS CLEAR THAT RULES ARE THERE TO SUSTAIN ORDER AND PEACE. IN THIS INSTANCE ALL RULES ARE MADE TO PREVENT ROGUES NATIONS AND UNS.

If you still object to this read the damn message over and over again until it gets through your thick skull.

Well that escalated quickly...

Tarafından yazıldı Utah, 27.07.2013 at 01:09

Well that escalated quickly...

Bastrike is mad because he acted like a bitch and got owned in his own scenario.

This are my rules:
1.- i follow the rules only if it increases my fun
2.- if i break the rules read number 1

of course everyone is gonna rougue, cuz Bastrike rules are stupid or too strict.

if some declares me war for "X" land, i can't attack the guy because the war is only for "X" land, if i lose it within 5 turns i lose the right to it and can't retake it or he declares me rougue.

I didn't say you would be declared rogue if you retake it however you would have to give the other nation 2 turns before requesting war again. Its called Recovery time dude. Also if there are rules it's for a reason.

Next time follow the rules and maybe I wouldn't have deleted my custom maps. You and others ruined it but none the less don't expect to be in any of my games. I am returning to Atwar however you won't be allowed to play in any of my games.

Good luck ruining your reputation Tunder3 you have serious problems if you follow your own rules when there are rules for you to follow. Also maybe you should refer to following the law too while you're at it considering if you keep thinking this way you won't last long on the streets before the police bring you in.

Good luck otherwise.

BAStrike

Lol thats some serius rage.

Tarafından yazıldı Ghost-IV, 05.07.2013 at 03:46

I am going to add a list of players who are banned from using UN.

With a screenshot MACEDONIAN is banned from being UN for going rogue. He broke Rule 7 Under Section 1 and the screenshot is below to prove it.



With a screenshot kingblueprint014 is banned for being UN for going rogue. He broke Rule 11 Under Section 1 and the screenshot is below to prove it. He was taking oil.

What if they were fighting rogues? You didn't put enough proof.