Tarafından yazıldı Skanderbeg, 05.04.2014 at 04:42
I just dont know if they really believe they are saving the world by killing arabs, invading sovereign european republics and genociding communists, or they know they are evil.
they don't know that they are evil, they just know that they need oil, and if someone doesn't give them oil, they kill them...
Tarafından yazıldı Skanderbeg, 05.04.2014 at 04:42
I just dont know if they really believe they are saving the world by killing arabs, invading sovereign european republics and genociding communists, or they know they are evil.
Atleast they brought free elections to Afghanistan, there is that.
Tarafından yazıldı Skanderbeg, 05.04.2014 at 04:42
I just dont know if they really believe they are saving the world by killing arabs, invading sovereign european republics and genociding communists, or they know they are evil.
Atleast they brought free elections to Afghanistan, there is that.
lulz, are you really Australian?
Tell me about the wars from 1914-2014 fought by the USA where Australia wasn't a co-belligerent?
Australia engages in war for the same reason America does: Perceived national interest.
Tarafından yazıldı Skanderbeg, 05.04.2014 at 04:42
I just dont know if they really believe they are saving the world by killing arabs, invading sovereign european republics and genociding communists, or they know they are evil.
Atleast they brought free elections to Afghanistan, there is that.
lulz, are you really Australian?
Tell me about the wars from 1914-2014 fought by the USA where Australia wasn't a co-belligerent?
Australia engages in war for the same reason America does: Perceived national interest.
WW1 was A-OK most people still identified as brits anyway.
WW2- Was still alright, people were alittle pissed to be going back so soon but we bandwagoned with UK
When it got to Korea I'm not sure but people were starting to become skeptical about joining other peoples wars
Vietnam came still skeptical but went in any way, full retard conscription and all. My Dad got shot twice wore out the cartilage in both his knees carrying a machine gun and poisoned by Agent Orange but he stronk and still works hard labour jobs even in his 80s. I hope to be half the man he is one day.
When the war on terror came we didn't throw down a large number of troops, we had memorial services on the T.V for every soldier that was killed, the PM attended all of them.
Tarafından yazıldı Skanderbeg, 05.04.2014 at 04:42
I just dont know if they really believe they are saving the world by killing arabs, invading sovereign european republics and genociding communists, or they know they are evil.
Atleast they brought free elections to Afghanistan, there is that.
lulz, are you really Australian?
Tell me about the wars from 1914-2014 fought by the USA where Australia wasn't a co-belligerent?
Australia engages in war for the same reason America does: Perceived national interest.
WW1 was A-OK most people still identified as brits anyway.
WW2- Was still alright, people were alittle pissed to be going back so soon but we bandwagoned with UK
When it got to Korea I'm not sure but people were starting to become skeptical about joining other peoples wars
Vietnam came still skeptical but went in any way, full retard conscription and all. My Dad got shot twice wore out the cartilage in both his knees carrying a machine gun and poisoned by Agent Orange but he stronk and still works hard labour jobs even in his 80s. I hope to be half the man he is one day.
When the war on terror came we didn't throw down a large number of troops, we had memorial services on the T.V for every soldier that was killed, the PM attended all of them.
What did you want to know?
It was a rhetorical question. Australia is serving its national interests, not abetting evil.
Tarafından yazıldı Skanderbeg, 05.04.2014 at 04:42
I just dont know if they really believe they are saving the world by killing arabs, invading sovereign european republics and genociding communists, or they know they are evil.
Atleast they brought free elections to Afghanistan, there is that.
lulz, are you really Australian?
Tell me about the wars from 1914-2014 fought by the USA where Australia wasn't a co-belligerent?
Australia engages in war for the same reason America does: Perceived national interest.
WW1 was A-OK most people still identified as brits anyway.
WW2- Was still alright, people were alittle pissed to be going back so soon but we bandwagoned with UK
When it got to Korea I'm not sure but people were starting to become skeptical about joining other peoples wars
Vietnam came still skeptical but went in any way, full retard conscription and all. My Dad got shot twice wore out the cartilage in both his knees carrying a machine gun and poisoned by Agent Orange but he stronk and still works hard labour jobs even in his 80s. I hope to be half the man he is one day.
When the war on terror came we didn't throw down a large number of troops, we had memorial services on the T.V for every soldier that was killed, the PM attended all of them.
What did you want to know?
It was a rhetorical question. Australia is serving its national interests, not abetting evil.
Tarafından yazıldı Skanderbeg, 05.04.2014 at 04:42
I just dont know if they really believe they are saving the world by killing arabs, invading sovereign european republics and genociding communists, or they know they are evil.
Im always amazed when people play the moral high ground in geo politics. The only states to genocide communists are communist states.
Im not fond of the Atlantic Empire but dont paint such a rosy picture of the East. You arent Putin, you arent a paid Russian shill. Stop talking like one, its infuriatingly stupid.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
Black Shark Hesap silindi
13.04.2014 - 08:51
Black Shark Hesap silindi
USSR invaded Czek, Afghanistan, annexed the Baltics, central asia...
Tito,
sorry, I have to disagree. After Lenin's death the USSR became an imperialistic State: colonizing territories, back-stabbing emancipatory leftist movements across the globe and installing techno-bureaucratic regimes with feudal mentality.
In this sense, Stalin was a traitor to the very notion of a leftist emancipatory global movement. Tito (the original) knew that, as did Buenaventura Durruti, Trotzky, and many other leftist leaders that were back-stabbed and/or instrumentalized by the CCCP-elite.
This has absolutely nothing to say about other imperialistic States; they are all shit for humanity!
Tarafından yazıldı Skanderbeg, 05.04.2014 at 04:42
I just dont know if they really believe they are saving the world by killing arabs, invading sovereign european republics and genociding communists, or they know they are evil.
Im always amazed when people play the moral high ground in geo politics. The only states to genocide communists are communist states.
Im not fond of the Atlantic Empire but dont paint such a rosy picture of the East. You arent Putin, you arent a paid Russian shill. Stop talking like one, its infuriatingly stupid.
I said it 100 times by now, it is 100% correct, checked, agreed by analytics and scientists, even politicians:
USSR/Russia never invaded other sovereign and independent country.
USA/EU/NATO invaded atleast 50 in just modern era. Most of them when they had crisis, system collapse, or just poor.
You can call it ''im playing high moral ground'' but thats a fact, >East good, West bad<
Czechoslovakia, Afghanistan, Finland, as well as territory it set up puppet dictatorships in in Eastern Europe after the defeat of German. Let's not forget Soviet help in Eritrea's independence and the Ethio-Somali war.
Tito,
sorry, I have to disagree. After Lenin's death the USSR became an imperialistic State: colonizing territories, back-stabbing emancipatory leftist movements across the globe and installing techno-bureaucratic regimes with feudal mentality.
In this sense, Stalin was a traitor to the very notion of a leftist emancipatory global movement. Tito (the original) knew that, as did Buenaventura Durruti, Trotzky, and many other leftist leaders that were back-stabbed and/or instrumentalized by the CCCP-elite.
This has absolutely nothing to say about other imperialistic States; they are all shit for humanity!
Czechoslovakia, Afghanistan, Finland, as well as territory it set up puppet dictatorships in in Eastern Europe after the defeat of German. Let's not forget Soviet help in Eritrea's independence and the Ethio-Somali war.
On a serious note: Tito's trying to say he believes that all of those invasions were orchestrated and planned-out by the West. I'm sure The West had some involvement in some of it, but it's pretty hard to trust a empire federation that boasts such heroic leaders such as Josef Stalin, and glorifies nuclear culture to this day.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
Black Shark Hesap silindi
14.04.2014 - 10:03
Black Shark Hesap silindi
Tarafından yazıldı Skanderbeg, 14.04.2014 at 03:55
Tarafından yazıldı Guest, 13.04.2014 at 08:51
USSR invaded Czek, Afghanistan, annexed the Baltics, central asia...
Czechoslovakia - political crisis, civilians started attacking army, army barracks and bases, soviets interfered to protect miltiary equipment. Soviet army from Poland, Hungary, Romania with Warsaw Pact allies crossed Czechoslovakian borders to send reinforcement. Not invasion
Hungary - rebellion and anti-communist movement. Soviet army interfered to save Hungarian comrades and Hungarian Communist Party. Warsaw Pact crossed border to help restore order.
Afghanistan - Technically and it looked like invasion, it can be called invasion, but Afghan government was CCCP ally. Soviet army just entered to sweep out talibans, terrorists and extremists.
Baltic was 300 years in Russian Empire, Stalin just incorporated it back where it belongs.
Central Asia was Russian 100 years, CCCP just incorporated it back.
Finland was Russian for 100 years, Stalin just wanted to take it back where it belongs.
So Scotland, Wales, Venice, Central Asia, the Baltics and Finland should have no right to independence?
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
Black Shark Hesap silindi
14.04.2014 - 10:09
Black Shark Hesap silindi
And are you praising Stalin? Am I reading something wrong? Stalin starved millions of Ukrainians. Sent children and adults to the Gulags, you can't deny he was evil. But I did hear he did it for the good of Russia though, but he was still evil and made Russia a totalitarian state, there was only one party and that was the Socialist party.
