Ouch Gönderiler: 72 Ülke: USA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dc5b/7dc5b3d68096fbd28fd6736bc9e0bea2eb272b1d" alt="" |
It is a good idea to the fact that submarines dont have a great capacity currently anyways...
----
-Man on a Mission
AkA berserk
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
Homero Gönderiler: 78 Ülke: Polonya
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e745a/e745a1c4f86ce3bf08c92e9083a8501ddc52326f" alt="" |
I would leave subs capacity where it is. They can transport 4 with MoS which I feel it's all right already.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
Homero Gönderiler: 78 Ülke: Polonya
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e745a/e745a1c4f86ce3bf08c92e9083a8501ddc52326f" alt="" |
Well maybe because AT primary role is to transport. Subs main role is surprise attack (in theory). Transport option is somehow a bonus like for helicopters in DS, and I know that in practice subs are just stealth transports rarely used for attacks but that doesn't mean they should be underwater transport for 4-5 units with 7 or 9 attack and stealth. If we go with capacity II why not make them benefit from Safer Transportation's +3 HP?
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Its ok how it is 5 is just no needed
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|