Nerf blitz to its old state!

No support.

Tarafından yazıldı Khal.eesi, 29.12.2014 at 08:57

Tarafından yazıldı Permamuted, 29.12.2014 at 08:55

Tarafından yazıldı blargh, 29.12.2014 at 08:12

Tarafından yazıldı Waffel, 28.12.2014 at 17:20

Feel free to discuss.

nerf waffel's trolling pls

Not suprised you and lao quoted that xaxaxa

Tarafından yazıldı Tundy, 28.12.2014 at 23:21

Tarafından yazıldı Sultan of Swing, 28.12.2014 at 22:35

Can we nerf RA too? I'm tired of noob saying it's better than PD.....

only a noob would use PD without infantry upgrades. or in anything but 10k europe.

I'm talking eu 10k, yea. I agree.. In some scenarios RA makes sense

Bahahahahha, and that is all I have to say on that.

Ok seriously tho, First it was IF then GC then GW then PD then SM then DS then PD then IF then PD then NC then PD now Blitz. (seeing the picture here?)

Basically when a strat becomes a little bit popular people start calling OP OP OP, tbh though bar a few little tweaks that might help atm is probably the most balanced I have seen strats since the tb update a while back.

-2 def again, NO.

Tarafından yazıldı b0nker2, 29.12.2014 at 23:59

Ok seriously tho, First it was IF then GC then GW then PD then SM then DS then PD then IF then PD then NC then PD now Blitz. (seeing the picture here?)

Basically when a strat becomes a little bit popular people start calling OP OP OP, tbh though bar a few little tweaks that might help atm is probably the most balanced I have seen strats since the tb update a while back.

-2 def again, NO.

Support

Tarafından yazıldı OG Pepperoni, 30.12.2014 at 01:01

Tarafından yazıldı b0nker2, 29.12.2014 at 23:59

Ok seriously tho, First it was IF then GC then GW then PD then SM then DS then PD then IF then PD then NC then PD now Blitz. (seeing the picture here?)

Basically when a strat becomes a little bit popular people start calling OP OP OP, tbh though bar a few little tweaks that might help atm is probably the most balanced I have seen strats since the tb update a while back.

-2 def again, NO.

Support

agree