Tüm reklamları gizlemek için premium alın
Gönderiler: 10   Ziyaret edenler: 398 users
21.04.2012 - 05:53
What is best strategy to play aginst Sky Menace?
Sorry for bad english.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
21.04.2012 - 09:20
 YOBA
Guerilla Warfare, assuming you have quite a bit of money and can easily pump out Marines. Master of Stealth may also be a half-decent choice, because the bombers will have great difficulty catching you before you attack, thereby giving you a massive advantage.

Basically, Marines are an SM player's worst enemy. Stealths, not so much really. Oh, and for GW, the giant buff Militia receive is really good, and so is attacking with Marines. The fact Spartacus1843 was playing GW meant I lost in the 3rd 1v1 tournament, despite his errors at the beginning (well, I made a couple too but not that huge ones). Any other strategy and it would have been an easy victory.
----
YOBA:
Youth-Oriented, Bydło-Approved
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
21.04.2012 - 16:05
Ok. Thanks!
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
23.04.2012 - 14:52
Basically any strategy that gives you cheap, powerful defensive units, like Perfect Defense, Iron Fist, and Imperialist. It takes about 1 bomber to kill 1 infantry, but infantry cost much less than bombers do. If you suddenly throw an army of 50 infantry at them, they would have to spend 6500 on bombers just to be sure they can kill the whole stack, while the infantry would only cost you between 30-70 each (1500-3500) (depending on strategy and upgrades). In this way, you can drain their money while continuing to pose a threat.
----
Qui non proficit, deficit. UCR 5/5/11-2/14/12. 6/17/12 - Coniunctum, sumus invicta.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
28.04.2012 - 11:17
Tarafından yazıldı TDFall, 23.04.2012 at 14:52

Basically any strategy that gives you cheap, powerful defensive units, like Perfect Defense, Iron Fist, and Imperialist. It takes about 1 bomber to kill 1 infantry, but infantry cost much less than bombers do. If you suddenly throw an army of 50 infantry at them, they would have to spend 6500 on bombers just to be sure they can kill the whole stack, while the infantry would only cost you between 30-70 each (1500-3500) (depending on strategy and upgrades). In this way, you can drain their money while continuing to pose a threat.


With imperialist and expendable infantry, infantry only cost 40 for me. MUCH less than bombers, and no defensive buff. Imperialist would be good at defending against SM, but not necessarily attacking.
----
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
28.04.2012 - 12:22
Tarafından yazıldı the equalizer, 28.04.2012 at 11:17

Tarafından yazıldı TDFall, 23.04.2012 at 14:52

Basically any strategy that gives you cheap, powerful defensive units, like Perfect Defense, Iron Fist, and Imperialist. It takes about 1 bomber to kill 1 infantry, but infantry cost much less than bombers do. If you suddenly throw an army of 50 infantry at them, they would have to spend 6500 on bombers just to be sure they can kill the whole stack, while the infantry would only cost you between 30-70 each (1500-3500) (depending on strategy and upgrades). In this way, you can drain their money while continuing to pose a threat.


With imperialist and expendable infantry, infantry only cost 40 for me. MUCH less than bombers, and no defensive buff. Imperialist would be good at defending against SM, but not necessarily attacking.


Tried ImP against SM the other day, ImP is terribad against it.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
28.04.2012 - 14:23
Tarafından yazıldı Garde, 28.04.2012 at 12:22

Tarafından yazıldı the equalizer, 28.04.2012 at 11:17

Tarafından yazıldı TDFall, 23.04.2012 at 14:52

Basically any strategy that gives you cheap, powerful defensive units, like Perfect Defense, Iron Fist, and Imperialist. It takes about 1 bomber to kill 1 infantry, but infantry cost much less than bombers do. If you suddenly throw an army of 50 infantry at them, they would have to spend 6500 on bombers just to be sure they can kill the whole stack, while the infantry would only cost you between 30-70 each (1500-3500) (depending on strategy and upgrades). In this way, you can drain their money while continuing to pose a threat.


With imperialist and expendable infantry, infantry only cost 40 for me. MUCH less than bombers, and no defensive buff. Imperialist would be good at defending against SM, but not necessarily attacking.


Tried ImP against SM the other day, ImP is terribad against it.


Maybe it's just you
----
Qui non proficit, deficit. UCR 5/5/11-2/14/12. 6/17/12 - Coniunctum, sumus invicta.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
28.04.2012 - 14:26
Tarafından yazıldı TDFall, 28.04.2012 at 14:23

Tarafından yazıldı Garde, 28.04.2012 at 12:22

Tarafından yazıldı the equalizer, 28.04.2012 at 11:17

Tarafından yazıldı TDFall, 23.04.2012 at 14:52

Basically any strategy that gives you cheap, powerful defensive units, like Perfect Defense, Iron Fist, and Imperialist. It takes about 1 bomber to kill 1 infantry, but infantry cost much less than bombers do. If you suddenly throw an army of 50 infantry at them, they would have to spend 6500 on bombers just to be sure they can kill the whole stack, while the infantry would only cost you between 30-70 each (1500-3500) (depending on strategy and upgrades). In this way, you can drain their money while continuing to pose a threat.


With imperialist and expendable infantry, infantry only cost 40 for me. MUCH less than bombers, and no defensive buff. Imperialist would be good at defending against SM, but not necessarily attacking.


Tried ImP against SM the other day, ImP is terribad against it.


Maybe it's just you


There is no possible way to beat an ever-expanding empire with much more money and units than you with ImP.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
28.04.2012 - 14:29
Tarafından yazıldı Garde, 28.04.2012 at 14:26

Tarafından yazıldı TDFall, 28.04.2012 at 14:23

Tarafından yazıldı Garde, 28.04.2012 at 12:22

Tarafından yazıldı the equalizer, 28.04.2012 at 11:17

Tarafından yazıldı TDFall, 23.04.2012 at 14:52

Basically any strategy that gives you cheap, powerful defensive units, like Perfect Defense, Iron Fist, and Imperialist. It takes about 1 bomber to kill 1 infantry, but infantry cost much less than bombers do. If you suddenly throw an army of 50 infantry at them, they would have to spend 6500 on bombers just to be sure they can kill the whole stack, while the infantry would only cost you between 30-70 each (1500-3500) (depending on strategy and upgrades). In this way, you can drain their money while continuing to pose a threat.


With imperialist and expendable infantry, infantry only cost 40 for me. MUCH less than bombers, and no defensive buff. Imperialist would be good at defending against SM, but not necessarily attacking.


Tried ImP against SM the other day, ImP is terribad against it.


Maybe it's just you


There is no possible way to beat an ever-expanding empire with much more money and units than you with ImP.


It depends on the situation, but it works 99% of the time (not against fruit)
----
Qui non proficit, deficit. UCR 5/5/11-2/14/12. 6/17/12 - Coniunctum, sumus invicta.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
05.05.2012 - 08:40
LDKtastic ERA
Hesap silindi
Perfect Defense can beat SM, but you have to attack with huge chunks. I suggest do Germany 10k PD against smers
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Gizlilik | Kullanım Şartları | Afişler | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Bize katılın

Herkese duyurun