|
Ivan, Amok, could it be possible for mapmakers to limit which strategies are available to a map?
For instance, I'm currently working on a reasonable way to represent units in space and strategies such as Naval Commander and Relentless Attack/Tank General would be useless and whoever picked those would be at a disadvantage; same with those who pick Desert Storm or Sky Menace in my ASOIAF map.
----
Tarafından yazıldı Mahdi, 23.11.2013 at 20:30
I don't consider the phrase "massive fag" to be an insult. Mods did.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Support
----
"Not all those who wander are lost."
-J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
I dont support, obvious reasons.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Ok...
1: You should warn about players in game description about what strategies are recommended or not recommended for your scenario-map-preset.
2: If for example one map have only sky menace avaible and i dont have sky menace unlocked then im forced to play with none.
3: You should try to make all the possible strategies useful in your map, each player have a completly different way to play, if i focused all my upgrades in Master of Stealth, and your map dont have stealth units, im probably not going to play your map.
4: Strategies are something that you are free to select, if i want to be in disadvantage you are nothing to stop me.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Its still a cool option to have, even if it excludes some players from that map. and not just as a helping hand, could be a limitation for a certain scenario side.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Also, that way you could disable all strategies which could prove useful in some tournaments.
Support.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Ok...
1: You should warn about players in game description about what strategies are recommended or not recommended for your scenario-map-preset.
2: If for example one map have only sky menace avaible and i dont have sky menace unlocked then im forced to play with none.
3: You should try to make all the possible strategies useful in your map, each player have a completly different way to play, if i focused all my upgrades in Master of Stealth, and your map dont have stealth units, im probably not going to play your map.
4: Strategies are something that you are free to select, if i want to be in disadvantage you are nothing to stop me.
1.- no one ever reads the description
2.- is your fault for having no good upgrades
3.- no stealth units in my scenario, you pick master of stealth = you are fucked. thats why this is implemented lol
4.- Free will = China rank 4 picks Naval Commander in a ww2 scenario and you contradicted your point 2.
Your argument is invalid, stop bitching about everything,
have a good day.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Create all unit as Type:Other and don't put commander units.
Aside for Imperialist Strategy, all other strategies and upgrades I'm aware of refer to specific role/type (secondary defense/stealth/transport etc).
Not a perfect solution but might be good enough.
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|
|
Yükleniyor...
Yükleniyor...
|